Build Your Dream, China Style A Woman’s Place is in the House
Jan 212009

Bill Drummond thinks that we have reached the end of recorded music.

His thinks that ‘real’ music makers are looking for new ways to create and share their work – like his ‘17′ project, in which he’s recording 100 choirs of 17 people all singing a single note, which he will play back to them at a one-off, never-to-be repeated event, before destroying the recordings.

Bill Drummond might be mad. And I love him for it.

WHO WANTS TO BE A MILLIONARE?

To set this in context, he was behind KLF, the acid house group that made a fortune in the early 1990s, then incinerated it to kick off their ‘K Foundation Burn a Million Quid’ tour.

He also considered cutting off his hand at The Brit Awards, but had second thoughts on that one.

Since then, he has popped up (I was about to say ‘on the art scene’, but Drummond really transcends that sort of pigeonhole), acting as one of life’s agents provocateurs, challenging conventional wisdom, posing difficult questions, and generally making people feel uncomfortable.

His latest notion is that recorded music is dead. The more I think about this, sitting  at my PC, listening to some easy jazz on Windows Media Player, the more I think he’s onto something. Here’s a summary of the story so far:

1) The most important artist in the history of recorded music isEnrico Caruso. In his short life (he died aged 48) he made over 220 recordings of tenor arias which meant that his public could now listen to him at home.

Caruso While that appears to be stating the blindingly obvious,  that’s because we’ve all grown up with it, and  assume it to be part of the  ‘natural’ state of affairs. In Caruso’s time, that was as significant a leap as powered flight. It changed everything.

He reached an audience with a representation of his work that hitherto had been the preserve of those who could get to La Scala or The Met. It was the beginning of the ‘democratisation’ of music.

In his way, he was the Bill Gates of the early recording industry. Edison and, later, Berliner may have created the hardware platform, but Caruso created the software. What did a member of the gentry want with an ugly wooden box and a great horn stuck on top of it? In itself, they didn’t – but they did want to listen to and to show their friends that they listened to the world’s greatest tenor.

2) The most important day in the history of recorded music is 5 July 1954, when a young truck driver walked into Sun Records to record a couple of songs for his mother. Fooling around between takes, he sang ‘That’s All Right (Mama), and the legend of Elvis Presley was born.

Putting aside Presley’s importance as a cultural icon, his significance in this context is that prior to recording, he had no musical career. He was entirely created by the record industry, a reversal in the relationship between artist and medium.

3) The most important year in the history of recorded music is 1966, when The Beatles and Glenn Gould made the same, paradigm-shifting decision: they would no longer play live:

gould.gif Classical pianist Gould wanted to concentrate of the Bach canon, and felt that the intimacy of the chamber genre couldn’t be communicated from the concert platform;

For The Beatles, the decision was more complex, but there’s no doubt it was heavily influenced by the fact that the techniques they had started to use on Revolver (tape looping and early sampling) couldn’t be toured. Sgt Peppers would be impossible to perform live.

And so the template changed again. The record (more specifically the album, by now format-of-choice) became an artefact in-and-of itself. Not a device for promoting the live performance, but an artwork that would stand alone.

4) The most important technology in the history of recorded music is the mp3 file. Think about how it is changing our relationship with recorded music:

* The album is redundant: through iTunes, Napster or any other file sharing site (legal or pirate) we can now pick and choose our tracks;

* Music is ubiquitous: we can play it anywhere, any time, in almost any circumstance. Muzak used to be limited to lifts, hotel lobbies and shopping centres. Now we take our own aural wallpaper wherever we go;

* There is no barrier to access: we can now reach any artist, any genre, any song, any composition, any time. And that ease makes us lazy. Music has become background sound, filling the empty spaces of our days, and plastering over the sonic mess of everyday life.

THE DAY THE MUSIC DIED

Drummond points out that before recording technology, music was context-depended: from orchestral compositions for State occasions to folk-songs in the field. Once it could be packaged and transferred into another setting – more importantly, any setting – it started to lose its meaning.  Which in turn, diminished its value.

record-player It is the paradox of the democratisation. When something is available all the time, at very little cost, we value it less. This is not an argument for exclusivity; rather it’s just pointing out that when the tap can be turned on at any time, we take water for granted. And with that, the thrill has gone.

The thrill of knowing that your favourite artist’s new record would be released in three months. Saving your pocket money to buy it. Selling stuff at school to make up the difference. The bus trip to town on Saturday. Entering the record shop and seeing its bright cover, smelling the cellophane wrapper, turning it over and reading the track list – the liturgy for the mass that will follow. Handing over the money, receiving the plastic bag and realising that the prize was yours. Cuddling it on the bus ride home, the hero returning from his/her quest. Rushing upstairs to your bedroom, turning on your record player, and then, and then…

The black circle, etched with a fine line that fragmented the light on its surface. Your hand, palm-spread as wide as possible across the underside, balancing it with care so not to mark the surface. Two hands now, fingers either side of the round, lowering it gently into place. Start the turntable. Bend down, eye-level with the needle. Gently lift the arm and …pause…anticipation…will it be as good as…swallow nervously…holding your breath… you drop the needle onto the surface…the speakers ‘bump’ then ‘hiss’ then…it begins. And it’s the best moment of your life. It is glorious.

Today? Point. Click. Type. Listen. Forget.

WAKE ME UP BEFORE YOU GO-GO

Do not think that this is a Luddite’s blast against the new and a return to the ‘good old days’. I love the web to the point of addiction. But there is no doubt that a lot of the ritual has gone, and with it, the magic.

This is what Drummond – with his off-the-wall, left-of-centre performances – is addressing. More specifically, he’s asking us to wake-up. If you’re one of 1700 people to have participated in his choral project, and you know that when you hear it in its full performance, it is the only time it will ever happen and that it will be destroyed immediately after – wouldn’t you pay attention?

Like you did the first time you placed the needle on that album.

The quality of that moment wasn’t in the music itself (the experience is equally relevant to the classical collector, the punk and the Roller’s fan). The quality was in the attention.

In the film Diva, the plot centres on a pirate recording of a operatic soprano who has never made a record. The only way you can experience her voice is to see her live. She believes that scarcity increases the quality of the moment.

That truth and the iPod are not easy bedfellows.

Popularity: 23% [?]

  • Share/Bookmark
  • Andy Morris
    you have a point. I distinctly remember the wow the first time I played Bauhaus' Third Uncle from a record I'd borrowed from the public library the previous day. That night, I stayed up til dawn playing the track and Prince's Temptation (borrowed at the same time) back to back. It was the night I discovered music.
    I now have over 40,000 songs in my collection, and yet all I listen to is www.radioparadise.com.
    Ex-Duran Duran bassist Roger Taylor nailed it for me in the BBC article http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/834717...
  • Michael Carter
    I think you've underplayed the packaging. My technology busting 15 year old Godson wants the sound track to 'The Boat That Rocked' for Xmas. For him it's not so many tracks hoovered together by grab from the Internet - it is a slice of life - albeit a fav memory of Richard Curtis of an era (over 40 years ago).

    Packaging does provide a context. Just as only performing in concert halls.
  • andy morris
    and a damn fine soundtrack it is
  • Michael Carter
    I think you've underplayed the packaging. My technology busting 15 year old Godson wants the sound track to 'The Boat That Rocked' for Xmas. For him it's not so many tracks hoovered together by grab from the Internet - it is a slice of life - albeit a fav memory of Richard Curtis of an era (over 40 years ago).

    Packaging does provide a context. Just as only performing in concert halls.
  • Good, thought-provoking stuff.

    I think there are two issues here. One is "experience". Since we remember what we were experiencing while the music was playing, then our memories are equally valid whether we listened to an MP3 or a live band. And the most emotionally-charged music we probably ever heard was in a party or disco or movie - recorded music played as part of a wider sensory experience. And let's face it the music was always a secondary element there!

    The second is "attention". I don't see that MP3's are essentially different to radio - music being streamed to you, only now selected by you or the Genius playlist rather than a DJ or produce. So I'm not convinced about the "attention" deficit involved in music as "wallpaper", I rather think that it's the lack of other elements that diminish the overall emotional charge compared to when we saved up to buy an album when we were kids - that album represented a huge capital investment that would be repaid by becoming a personal soundtrack to all the other things we experienced at that time.

    So perhaps the issue is that people just don't listen. And that's not an issue of environment or ubiquity, it's that they are always doing something else rather than just listening. You have to make a space in your life to just listen to music. I enjoy my music collection on MP3 as much as I did on album or CD, and I still buy new music. But I now have a room in which I can listen to it, and sitting in my library with a glass of wine creates the same enjoyment as sitting in my bedroom as a kid.
  • Thanks for taking the time to read, and the thoughts. I agree with you; MP3 is just the next step in a continuum that leads from shellac discs to the radio. But even with broadcast, there is an element of limit to access. The question of our capacity to listen is, I think, inextricably linked to the ubiquity of the technology. At a subconscious level, we always know that there is the potential to repeat the experience. That's why Drummond introduces an auto-destructive element to his work; if you don't pay attention, you're going to miss it.
  • My brother just lent me Mark Knoffler's lastest CD "Crimson something". After two plays I'm rather regretting my three listens rule
  • But I thought you had to listen a third time before you reached the conclusion that you didn't want to listen for a third time?
  • David Thornton
    A thought provoking piece as is the norm Paul.

    Music is certainly ubiquitous these days, more variety, easier to access and for those of us who still (mostly) pay for it as cheap as chips. The only problem I find with this abundance, are we really listening to it?.

    Hejira - Joni Mitchell, Illinoise - Sufjan Stevens, Bright Lights - Richard and Linda Thompson .

    Three random items from the Thornton collection and top of any list that I would prepare if I were to ditch the CD format. Any replacement would have to be the entire record as it was conceived and originally released, because I am interested in the totality of the work not the highlights. Individual tracks from each lose much of their impact listened to in isolation, highlights in any case change over time. When I hear the fade out of "Coyote" my brain is already receiving the opening bars of " Amelia" .....

    A common factor in all of the above and indeed probably all of my favourite CDs is that the work has grown on me. It has taken time for me to be completely absorbed by the work. I admire Mossy's three listens before forming an opinion and am now doing this myself. Back to Hejira, it's not an easy listen. Today, when most of us can download 4-5 full Cds in the time taken to type this comment, I wonder whether the same record released today by an unknown would find an audience willing to give it the time to get to know and enjoy it.
  • Whilst the Beatles clearly stopped performing live for artistic reasons and that no one was actually listening to them, George Harrison was a major protagonist in their packing it all in.

    He had a morbid fear of flying, accentuated by the "flimsy" aircraft used whilst touring the States and that several of his heroes had perished in that way - ergo Buddy Holly (good link there)

    Boarding one such plane he noticed a rope ladder and enquired to the cabin crew its purpose.

    "That's in case we have an emergency, Mr Harrison, and have to exit the plane quickly"

    "So we'll be cruising at a constant twelve feet" was Harrison's tert reply.
  • Undoutedly the buying experience of music has completely changed and there is a significant generational shift involved. My thoughts on downloads are well documented, and now the source of much teasing (along with mobiles, dvd and even cd before that), and I am finding that my ever increasing collection is now "soul less" being my own cds from downloaded/borrowed (friends and libraries) without the inserts, etc.
    But it has enabled me to exponentially widen my listening experience across genres and artists at a significantly reduced cost. I treasure and value them to be played repeatedly in the future, something I think that any one under 30 seems to disregard as being unworthy. I think they might regret that when they become middle aged and will be re visting.
    For me the bottom line is that music creates memories, whether it be LC at Glastonbury or a time shared. Recorded music allows you to immerse your self in a time and place long gone, and for that reason it will survive. Nostalgia is a strong human emotion.
blog comments powered by Disqus